Mortgage Refinancing It is not uncommon to hear or read about how much home court advantage a college sports team has, based on the team having won a high percentage of games played at home. In a recent article, “Home Court Advantage – Can You Believe All You Hear?” I addressed the issue of why this kind of analysis is flawed unless you compare percentage of home wins to percentage of away wins.
Juegos Here I am going to address a second reason why what often is mistaken to be home court advantage really isn’t. The issue is that the concept of home court advantage requires that one compare how well a team does at home with how well they do on the road, when the opponents under these two circumstances are of more or less equal ability.
Home Buyer Let me use a somewhat absurd hypothetical example to make my point. Imagine that a decent, but not outstanding, major college baseball team plays twenty games, ten at home and ten away. Continue to imagine, but I have to warn you that here it gets a little weird, that the ten home games are played against local high school JV teams, while the ten away games are against Texas Tech, Minnesota, Arizona State, Stanford, Florida State, Texas, and other perennial college baseball powerhouses. It’s not difficult to imagine what the results would be. The team would most likely win all ten of its home games and probably be extremely lucky to win even half of its away games.
So, since the team won a lot more at home than away should we conclude that they have a big home court advantage? Of course not. Its simple to see that they were playing the easy teams at home and the hard teams away. That’s why they did so much better at home.
Although the hypothetical example is kind of weird, in reality this same situation occurs every year in every major college baseball conference. Let me explain. Major college baseball teams play roughly half of their games against other teams in the conference in home-and-away series. The other half of their games are against non-conference opponents. When I analyzed all of the baseball games played by teams in the SEC, ACC, Pac-10, Big Ten, and Big 12 Conferences from 1998 through 2007, here’s what I found. These teams played most of the non-conference games at home and they won most of those games. In fact, against the “easy” non-conference opponents, they won about 79% of the time at home. Against conference teams (those of more similar ability) they won about 56% of the time at home.
Pros and cons
In areas with a dry environment and a low amount of natural light, this synthetic grass is very ideal to use. As this is an artificial grass, it can be used in any type of ground and can be exposed to all types of weather without getting much damage.
In home gardens and lawns, this is also a perfect choice. Not all homeowners are free to maintain their grasses and for these people, installing artificial turf is the better solution. This can even be used in roof gardens and areas surrounding the swimming pool.
A few disadvantages cited with the use of artificial turf are skin injuries such as abrasions and turf toe. These conditions normally result from playing on synthetic grass. Also, this type of grass is hotter when exposed to the sun’s rays for a long period You can be published without charge. You can to republish this article in your website or blog. Please provide links Active.
Site Posts Feed